logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2017.11.23 2017고단120
업무방해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, by a fine of KRW 3 million, and by a fine of KRW 1 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 120 "

1. Defendant A’s interference with Defendant A’s duties: (a) was forced to be discharged from the E Medical Center located in D on the ground of an act of disturbance of drinking at the E Medical Center from March 30, 2017 to March 16:00 of the same day; (b) was expressed a large amount of voice from the 7th floor of the Medical Center; and (c) was placed on the floor of plastic physical disease; and (d) was prevented.

F nurse “I shall not go to house, and she shall not go to house.”

The victim G hospital business and the diagnosis and treatment duties, which are the operator of E Medical Center, were obstructed by force by avoiding disturbance, such as “drawing,” etc.

Defendant A and Defendant B are legally married couple, and Defendant C are children of Defendant A.

2. Defendant B

A. 1) On May 6, 2016, the Defendant destroyed two parts of the market price in which the injured party, who was in mind on the math, was cultivated by the injured party, at around 20:50 on a residential area located in Heung-gun H, 2016, on the ground that the injured party A was under the influence of alcohol, and then damaged two parts of the market price in which the injured party cultivated.

2) 피고인은 2016. 5. 7. 09:50 경 위 주거지 마당에서, 피고인이 피고인의 아들에게 줄 쌀을 감춰 놓았다는 이유로 피해자 A가 욕을 하자, 방 안에 있던 피해자 소유인 시가 미상의 조끼 1벌을 집 앞에 있는 냇가에 버리고, 낫으로 마당에 피해 자가 재배하던 시가 미상의 양파 2 단을 베어 손괴하였다.

3) On November 14, 2016, the Defendant: around 15:30 on November 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) removed the entrance of the warehouse in the market that is not owned by the victim A, and destroyed it by opening the entrance of the warehouse in the market.

B. On June 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at a warehouse located in the above residence on June 21, 2016, the Defendant did not dispute with the victim A; and (b) rejected the dangerous object (hereinafter “one-time omission”); (c) removed the entrance door of the market in which the victim owned, and destroyed it.

2) 피고인은 2016. 6. 21. 10:00 경 위 주거지에서, 피해자 A가 화풀이로 변기통을 깼다는 이유로 화가 나,...

arrow