Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 19:00 on August 1, 2020, the Defendant received 112 reports on ‘C' restaurant located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, and received a request from the police officer E and policeman F to leave the place where the Defendant called out, and she took a bath to get out of the country, such as the police officer E and the police officer F. On the other hand, the Defendant assaulted the above police officer E by drinking the front knee of the knee of the knee of the knee, and by walking the knee of the knee of the knee of the kne.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of CCTV-cape photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that a criminal defendant, who was sentenced to imprisonment in 2018 and was sentenced to imprisonment in 2018, commits assaulting a police officer who was dispatched after receiving 112 report during the period of repeated crime, thereby obstructing the performance of official duties, and the nature of such crime is not somewhat subject to strict punishment.

그러나 피고인이 실형을 선고받은 사건은 술에 취해 식당 주인을 폭행하는 등의 공소사실로 기소되어 불출석 상태에서 공시송달로 진행되었던 사건인 점, 피고인에게 위 실형 전과 외에는 1987년 이전의 경미한 벌금형 전력만 있었던 점으로 보아 피고인에게 폭력적인 성향이 있다고 보이지 않는 점, 피고인은 이 사건 범행 당일 상처(喪妻)한 후배를 위로하면서 술을 많이 마셨고, 만취한 상태에서 귀가하다가 범행장소인 식당에 혼자 들어가게 된 점, 112신고를 받고 경찰관이 위 식당에 찾아갔을 때에는 피고인이 조용하게 술을 마시고 있었고,...