logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.03.28 2012고정3557
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:15 on September 13, 2012, the Defendant tried to take out the “D” restaurant located in Suwon-si C, which is a problem between the victim E (58 years of age) and the main issue.

At this time, the defendant who prevents the victim from leaving the defendant was satisfeed with the victim's chest, was satisfed with the victim's chest, was satisfed once, and the victim was satisfed with the body for about 14 days, and the victim was satisfe, sat, sat, and satched with a satch, sat, and satch

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. A written statement;

1. An investigation report (general), an investigation report (Submission of a medical certificate for injury), and a medical certificate for injury;

1. CCTV photographs on the wall of a assault;

1. Application of CCTV data CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are asserted that the defendant had inflicted bodily injury on the victim, and they did not inflict any injury on the victim as stated in its reasoning. Thus, the above argument is not accepted, taking into account the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence mentioned above, namely, the victim E statements that the defendant had inflicted any injury on the victim as stated in its reasoning; the defendant's statement that the victim victim Eul made a statement that the victim had injured the victim as stated in its reasoning; and the defendant's body fighting is recorded in CCTV, such as the defendant's statement that corresponds to the criminal facts in its judgment, and the fact that the defendant inflicted any injury on the victim as stated in its reasoning.

arrow