logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.07.14 2016노890
상해등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the injury, the victim did not inflict an injury on the victim, but did not inflict an injury on the victim, and the victim did not inflict an injury on the completeness of the body due to the instant case.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged is erroneous.

B. As to interference with business, the Plaintiff was not at the site at the time of the instant case

The judgment of the court below that found F guilty of this part of the facts charged is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, since the testimony of F is reliable.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below as to the injury is based on the evidence duly admitted and examined, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the prosecutor, i.e., the defendant and the victim prior to the occurrence of the instant case, and the defendant and the victim may see each other, and even based on video materials submitted by the defendant, it can be known that the defendant and the victim dispute each other, and ii) the victim suffered the injury as a result of an attack between the victim and the victim, taking full account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the court below's evidence, such as the suspect interrogation protocol of the police suspect against the defendant, etc.

arrow