1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding adding this court’s decision as to the claim for director’s remuneration as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

In order to be opened, deleted, or added, the part of the first instance judgment, i.e., from 3 pages 6 to 8, i.e., the claim for a refund for year-end settlement or return. The part of the first instance judgment, i.e., the claim for a refund from 3 side to 7 side of the third to 5, i.e., the refund for year-end settlement or from 3 side of the

Part 4 of the first instance judgment "No. 2, 4 through 6, 9 through 26" shall be written with "No. 23, No. 2, 4 through 6, 8 through 26, and 45," respectively.

At the bottom of the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance, "transfer" in the second part shall be added to the following:

7) From 2010 to 2014, the Plaintiff alleged that the Defendant’s sales amount was KRW 618,358,945 in 2010, KRW 2,264,250,548 in 2011, KRW 343,32,91 in 2012, KRW 5,182, KRW 633,617 in 2013, KRW 6,115,298,987 in 2014, and there is no need to borrow money from the Plaintiff because the sales amount falls short of KRW 3,343,32,91 in 203, KRW 50 in 201, KRW 340 in 208 in 201, KRW 34,00 in 200 in 208, KRW 160 in 208.310 in 201.