The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In fact, although the defendant entered into a lease contract with CO through CN on his own building, he was unaware of the fact that sexual traffic was mediated for the business of the above building, the judgment of the court below which held that the defendant provided a building to E, knowing that he was provided for sexual traffic, is erroneous in the misapprehension of the fact and affected the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year of suspended execution in April, community service, and additional collection 16,935,440 won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The facts charged in the instant case are as follows: (a) from April 2010 to May 18, 2012, E is an employee of a large number of 10,000 won of sexual traffic, such as G sports marina site (hereinafter “Gmast site”) located in F II in the Gyeong-si city and the business establishment (hereinafter “Ima place”) located in H, such as telephone opening and registration; (b) the illegal aliens of Thailand (n, 27 years of age, L), and 150,000 won of Ma (n, 35 years of age, N), O (n, 40 years of age, hereinafter “P”), and 150,000 won of Mamath site, which entered into the Republic of Korea with the status of stay exempt from the visa of Thailand and 150,000 won of Mastdong site, and the Defendant, on May 25, 2011, had his/her employees and 1500,000,0 of Ma.