beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 85,241,35; (b) KRW 5,00,000; (c) KRW 3,000,00 for Plaintiff C, D, E, F, and G; and (c) KRW 3,00,000 for Plaintiff B.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties 1) The Plaintiff A’s I Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) as follows.
(B) The Plaintiff is the husband of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff is the husband of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff C, D, E, F, and G are the children of the Plaintiff. (2) The Defendant is a doctor who establishes and operates an I Hospital in the Seo-gu Daejeon District Court.
B. On June 2004, Plaintiff A received treatment at Defendant Hospital and its progress 1) the left-hand sculping surgery at Defendant Hospital. However, on January 7, 2013, Plaintiff A re-hospitalized the Defendant Hospital on the following day, and from January 8, 2013 to November 50, 201, Plaintiff A re-hospitalized the left-hand sculing surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”).
(2) On January 9, 2013, the day following the instant surgery, Plaintiff A started to show symptoms of horse speculation, such as Dayarthia, and Mabalsy on the left side (Lt. fial palsy) around 18:00 on the same day, and around 22:0 on the same day.
(3) On January 10, 2013, the Defendant Hospital deemed that there was a neological disorder to Plaintiff A, and transferred the said Plaintiff to KSI’s first-aid service route (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). In the foregoing Kne and Kne, the Plaintiff conducted brain MI photographs against the said Plaintiff, diagnosed the said Plaintiff with acute acute cerebral cerebral chromosome, and immediately transferred the said Plaintiff to the YI hospital (hereinafter “the time of the instant accident”). (4) The Gneinnam University Hospital’s surgery, which was transferred to the Plaintiff, was immediately re-issued to the Plaintiff’s hospital, on the ground that 3 hours more than 3 hours more than 10 hours more than 3 hours after the cerebral spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic fraxim under the Preservation Treatment Act, instead of the Treatment Act, which was used for blood exclusive revocation.
5) After that, on January 31, 2013, Plaintiff A was transferred to the rehabilitation department of the same hospital in the New Hospital Hospital for rehabilitation treatment and treatment.