logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.11.28 2017구단71676
부정수급액반환명령등취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

In light of the above legal principles, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff’s employee’s occupational ability development training conducted by means of postal remote training (hereinafter “instant training”) and the Plaintiff’s employee’s occupational ability development training conducted by means of remote training (hereinafter “first training”) as indicated below, and that the Plaintiff’s employee’s occupational ability development training conducted by means of remote training (hereinafter “instant training”) was conducted in a normal manner, and that the Plaintiff’s employee’s “number of completed students” among the trainees (hereinafter “instant trainees”) satisfied the standards for completing remote training (hereinafter “standards for completing the training”), and that the Plaintiff’s employee’s occupational ability development training conducted by means of remote training (hereinafter “C”), the Plaintiff’s employee’s employee’s occupational ability development training conducted by means of remote training (hereinafter “instant training”) was paid a total of KRW 17,344,320, as “subsidies”).

On February 18, 2014, the date of concluding a contract for the grant of the training entrustment contract for the training order * the other party * The amount of training expenses (cost) paid for the number of trainees completed during the course name 1.3.11 to May 11, 2014, the work of improving A taxi workers from March 11, 2014 to May 11, 2014, 155 135 8,680,000 on June 11, 2014, 7,560,000 on June 11, 2014, 200 2. B from May 9, 2016 to July 16, 2016:

The Defendant against the Plaintiff on June 9, 2017, on the ground that “this case trainees did not undergo the instant training and failed to meet the completion standards, and the Plaintiff applied for subsidies to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea and received them.” ① The former Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers (amended by Act No. 13902, Jan. 27, 2016; hereinafter “Act on the Development of Workplace Skills”) was enforced from July 28, 2016; hereinafter “Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers”); Article 5(2) of the amended Act; and the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers below the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers.”

arrow