Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On April 14, 2016, the Defendant lent KRW 10 million to the victim C (the 42-year-old age), who was a debtor, to the victim C (the 42-year-old age), but the victim was unable to refrain from changing it. On November 21, 2016, the Defendant agreed to be provided with a motor vehicle as security, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 17 million in the name of his/her father and wife, around November 21, 2016.

On April 17, 2017, when the victim C was consulted at the original public health clinic located in the original public health clinic located in 139 on the date of the original city, the Defendant: (a) received the key of the said vehicle from the victim who believed it to be “the next key to the vehicle at the vehicle at the vehicle”; (b) cut off the said vehicle from the victim who believed it; and (c) arbitrarily driven the said vehicle in possession of the victim parked in the said public health clinic by using the said key.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C, E, and F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the police officers to the accused (including the net part of the interrogation of the accused;

1. A copy of the letter of commitment and a copy of each delivery letter [the defendant and his defense counsel agree in advance that the defendant would not be punished for larceny because he would drive the said vehicle with the keys from the injured party in accordance with the above agreement on the day of the crime, in the circumstance that the defendant would be provided with the said vehicle as a security for the obligation of the injured party. However, the above evidence may be comprehensively considered and recognized as follows: ① the victim consistently stated to the effect that "the defendant would have changed the key of the vehicle waiting for the vehicle," i.e., the following circumstances that the victim could be recognized as having consistently, and this is the fact recognized by the defendant (see, e.g., right 14 of the investigation record), ② the confirmation that the defendant again received the victim's confirmation (see, e.g., evidence record 57) that the defendant would have been found at the last time with the husband

“If the victim took the key to the delivery of the security like the Defendant’s assertion, the future model model is presented.