logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2015.07.06 2014고정1721
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 11, 2014, the Defendant driven a car at CST520 on July 14, 2014, and led to a two-lane intersection in front of the fire station in the Busan High Sea, Daegu High Sea, to a two-lane radius from the Yak Stak ground to the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the port of the sea.

Since there is an intersection where a signal is installed, there was a duty of care to observe the traffic signal and drive the motor vehicle safely by checking well the front left.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the defendant neglected this and proceeded, the defendant suffered injury, such as fluoral dump dump dump dump dump dump dump eump dump dump eump dump dump eump dump dump eump dump dump dump eump dump dump dump (37 years old) which had taken place from

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement made by the defendant in this Court;

1. A statement made by the witness D in this Court;

1. To describe a copy of the diagnosis of D prepared by doctor F;

1. Application of each video statute of the field photograph (Evidence No. 9, 10 pages), each vehicle collision photograph (Evidence No. 34, 35, 37 pages);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents in the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The summary of the charge of the violation of the Road Traffic Act among the charges of this case concerning the dismissal of prosecution of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order is that the Defendant, as stated in the facts constituting a crime, neglected the duty of safe driving while driving a vehicle at the SM520 as indicated in the judgment of the court, thereby damaging the 528i vehicle at the cost of repairing 1,331,110 of the 528i vehicle based on SM520 as stated in the judgment of the court below.

This is a crime falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow