1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the pertinent part, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

2. Parts in height:

(a)the second 17th 17th 17th 17th 2 judgment of the first instance court must be read as “where there exists”;

B. The 3rd part of the judgment of the first instance court is that “the plaintiff prepared” and “the plaintiff holds its duplicate.”

C. The third 8-party 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance states that “no evidence exists. In addition, according to the result of appraiser B’s written appraisal, it is recognized that the Plaintiff’s signature stated in the insurance subscription form is different from the Plaintiff’s penology, and according to this, among the contents of the Plaintiff’s written solicitation statement submitted by C, it appears that the Plaintiff signed in the insurance subscription form is different from the fact. However, it is difficult to confirm the fact that C explained that the instant insurance contract was an insurance policy to the Plaintiff on the sole basis of the fact that the Plaintiff did not write his signature in the insurance subscription form and C made a false statement different from the fact.”

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.