All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The plaintiff co-litigation intervenor raised by this court.

1. The judgment on the plaintiffs' claim - The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are quoted by the main sentence of Article 4

(A) The Plaintiff’s application for intervention in the co-litigation on February 2, 1999 is justified as it does not meet the requirements of Article 83(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, and the Plaintiff’s application for intervention in the co-litigation on February 2, 1999, where the purpose of the lawsuit is to be determined jointly with one of the parties and a third party (the co-litigants) (the intervenor) (the intervenor’s assertion itself is, the purpose of the lawsuit is to be determined jointly with the Plaintiff and the intervenor. As such, the Intervenor’s application for intervention in the co-litigation is unlawful as it does not meet the requirements of Article 83(1) of

3. As such, the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed in its entirety due to the lack of grounds. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, all appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed in its entirety due to the lack of grounds, and since the plaintiff's application for intervention in the co-litigation filed by this court is illegal and cannot be corrected, it is dismissed in its judgment without holding any pleadings in accordance with Article 219