1. The application for intervention in the instant co-litigation shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit resulting from the intervention in the co-litigation.

1. The intervention in an ex officio judgment as to the legitimacy of a request for intervention in a co-litigation shall be permitted in cases where the subject matter of the lawsuit ought to be jointly confirmed against either party and a third party (an intervenor in a co-litigation) (Article 83(1) of the Civil Procedure Act). Even in cases where the assertion of the intervenor in the plaintiff co-litigation (hereinafter “the intervenor”), the subject matter of the lawsuit should be determined jointly with the plaintiff and the intervenor in the case 2020Na 11918 (excluding this case, February 2, 2021), and it is difficult to view that the plaintiff and the intervenor in the case 2020Na 11918 (excluding this case, February 2, 2021), and thus, the application for intervention in a co-litigation by the intervenor does not meet the requirements under Article

2. Conclusion, the motion for intervention in the instant co-litigation is unlawful and cannot be corrected. Thus, the motion for intervention in the instant co-litigation is dismissed by a judgment without pleading pursuant to Article 219 of the Civil Procedure Act.