logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.22 2014고단9743 (1)
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 1 underground floors and the 2nd underground floors with 10 sabrush rooms, 16 sabrush rooms, and 16 sabrush rooms, etc. are businesses reported for public bath business in the name of E, an external mother of D.

F, G, and Defendant 1 are employees who have been in charge of the affairs such as cleaning a store, guiding customers, calculating fees, etc. at the above business establishment, and H is an employee who has been in charge of commodity management and accounting at the above business establishment.

I, J, K, L, etc. are employees who have engaged in mathing against male customers, and M and N are employees who have engaged in similar behavior that leads to their sexual organ by hand against customers who have completed maths.

The Defendant, in collusion with F, G, and H on March 25, 2013, announced that the male fingers receive KRW 1.30,00 won in cash from him/her and provided guidance to the second basements underground, and that female employees, such as I, etc., divide the telegraph of the first guest into hand and have N engage in a similar behavior that makes N interfered with the sexual organ of male guests by hand, and that they allow N to interfere with the sexual organ of the male guest on February 21, 2013, the facts charged in the indictment on the charge of the indictment around February 21, 2013 are as follows:

However, the Defendant committed an act from February 21, 2013 at the police station.

On October 7, 2012, the Defendant appeared to have participated in the crime.

there is no evidence to consider.

The F stated that “the Defendant was working on one month (the 291th page of the investigation record)” and unlike other accomplices, it appears that the Defendant’s wage transfer details also correspond to the Defendant’s statement.

As the period of crime is reduced, there is no disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, it is recognized as stated in its judgment

From March 25, 2013 to March 25, 2013, sexual traffic mediation and other acts were conducted.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the prosecution against H and F;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. G, F, I, J,O, K.

arrow