Defendant

A Imprisonment for 6 months and fines for 5,000,000 won, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine for 1,50,000 won, Defendant C shall be punished by a fine for 700.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Intermediating Commercial Sex Acts (Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts) is the owner of “G” in the F and the first floor of Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City. From June 10, 2015 to July 1, 2015, Defendant A posted an advertisement on the publicity site of commercial sex business establishments, including “H” and “I”, and made female employees, who are called “A” with KRW 90,000,000, paid KRW 30,000 to female employees in return for the payment of KRW 30,000 in return for female employees, and caused them to interfere with the act of similarity in such a way as to stimulate the sexual organ of male guests.

Accordingly, Defendant A committed an act of arranging sexual traffic in collusion with Defendant B from June 10, 2015 to July 1, 2015 (referred to as the following 2 from June 29, 2015 to July 1, 2015).

(b) He/she shall not engage in massage for profit without obtaining the recognition of qualifications as a marina in violation of the Medical Service Act;

Nevertheless, from June 10, 2015 to July 15, 2015, the Defendant got female employeesJ, etc., who did not receive money from the said “G” business establishment and did not obtain recognition of the qualification as a massage club, to take the place in such a way as to unfash or fash the body of the individual male customers, such as their hair, neck, shoulder, bat, and bat, or the body of the individual male customers, or the body of the individual male customers, fash or fast, and stimulates their fast.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with J et al., committed an act of massage for profit without obtaining qualification recognition.

2. Defendant B served as an employee at the aforementioned “G” business establishment from June 29, 2015 to July 1, 2015, and informed a male customer by obtaining a pre-contract telephone and provided guidance to “A lighting staff member,” Defendant B, upon completion of the Mack, had the “B manager” enter the room in which a male customer is a male customer and caused him/her to interfere with the similarity.

Accordingly, Defendant B on June 29, 2015.