1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be individually counted.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the addition of the following contents as to the allegations emphasized or added by the plaintiff and the defendant in the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. Additional determination

A. The plaintiff's assertion concerning the plaintiff's assertion that the degree of contribution to the calculation of the rate of labor disability should be 21.66% [16/36 x 0.3 x (16 x 5 x 24 x 24)] which reflects the rate of disability and the period of disability of the king (24%) during the period of the defendant's admission. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant's apportionment of contribution to the calculation of the rate of labor disability should be 21.6% [16/36 x 0.3 x (16 x 5 x 24 x 2] which reflects the rate of disability and the period of disability of the king (16%, 5 years, 30%) during the period of the defendant's admission. It is reasonable to determine the amount of compensation corresponding to the degree of contribution to the victim's after the accident and the victim's s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s s sss sss s ss ss ss ss s).

B. The Defendant asserts that the labor disability loss rate should be assessed once again by conducting physical appraisal of anesthesia pain and mental health department for himself/herself.

The defendant.