logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.08.23 2019노123
아동학대범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(아동복지시설종사자등의아동학대가중처벌)
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, 40 hours of order to attend a lecture, 3 years of restriction on employment) of the lower court is deemed to be too uneasible and unfair.

2. Ex officio determination

A. Article 59-3(1) of the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities (Act No. 15904) (amended by Act No. 15904), which was effective June 12, 2019, provides that where the court issues a sentence of imprisonment for or medical treatment and custody by sex offense, the court shall make an order to operate welfare facilities for persons with disabilities or to prohibit them from providing employment or actual labor to welfare facilities for a certain period from the date such punishment or medical treatment and custody is completely or partially completed, suspended or exempted (where a fine is imposed, the date on which such punishment becomes final and conclusive) by judgment (hereinafter referred to as “order to restrict employment”) and simultaneously with the judgment of a sex offense case. The proviso to Article 59-3(1) provides that the same shall not apply where

In addition, Article 2 of the Addenda to Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities (Act No. 15904, Dec. 11, 2018) provides that Article 59-3(1) of the Act on Welfare of Persons with Disabilities applies to a person who has committed a sex offense before the enforcement of the Act and has not been finally determined.

B. Article 29-3(1) of the Child Welfare Act (Law No. 1589) enacted on June 12, 2019 provides that where the court declares a sentence or medical treatment and custody for committing a child abuse-related crime, it shall, by judgment, impose an order to operate a child-related institution or not to provide employment or actual labor to a child-related institution for a certain period from the date the execution of the sentence or medical treatment and custody is terminated, suspended or exempted (where a fine is sentenced, the date on which the sentence becomes final) or the execution of the sentence is suspended or exempted (hereinafter referred to as “order to restrict employment”), and the proviso to Article 29-3(1) provides that such order shall be issued simultaneously with the judgment of the child abuse-related

arrow