beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years, for one year and six months, for Defendant C, for eight months, and for Defendant D, for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
It is necessary to revise and supplement part of the facts charged without following the amendment of indictment to the extent that it seems that there is no concern about actual disadvantage to the defendants' defense right.
[2] Although the facts charged of the 2013 Highest 1612 Defendants A, B, and C] Korea method-based investment trust fund 2 are indicated as the “Korean A method-based investment fund,” it appears to be a clerical error in the “Korean A method-based investment fund,” and it is corrected and corrected as stated in the main sentence.
(2) The following facts are revealed: (a) the Plaintiff’s investigation records of the instant case (see, e.g., 118, 122, 260, 270; hereinafter “victim’s Fund”) are deemed to be a small and medium enterprise establishment investment association based on the funds invested by government agencies, such as the Small and Medium Business Corporation, pursuant to the Act on Special Measures for the Promotion of Venture Businesses; and (b)
The victim fund is a venture business that has certain conditions in accordance with its operating rules and guidelines, and files an application for a blanket investment with at least a certain amount of investment from three or three members affiliated with the diesel club, and invests in the method of acquiring new stocks issued by the venture business (hereinafter referred to as “one-time investment bond”) within the same amount of funds (hereinafter referred to as “one-time investment fund”) after examining whether each of the above conditions falls under the said conditions, the authenticity of investment by at least three diesel investors, etc.
1. Defendant A and B are the representative director of the K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “K”), and Defendant B is the representative of the LVA and the representative of M Co., Ltd., the consulting company.
The crime committed around June 2012, Defendant A sought a scheme for securing funds because it is difficult for Defendant A to operate the company due to the shortage of funds from Defendant B in the middle of April 2012. Since it is impossible to find an individual investor to invest in K from Defendant B, Defendant A is the best fund to invest and the diesel investor.