1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 155,887,002 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from January 26, 2010 to December 16, 2011.

The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall be judged together.

1. On July 20, 2005, the Plaintiff: (a) received orders from the Defendant on July 20, 2005 from the Defendant to supply and demand “the construction of the building and packing for the building and packing for the building and packing for the building and packing for the building and driving for the building and driving for the building and driving for the building and driving for the building and driving for the building and driving for the building and driving for the building.”

The payment period for the construction work of this case is 15 days from the date of receipt from the order office on February 6, 2010. The payment period is 1,479,404,000 (it shall be changed to 2,690,060 on two occasions) of the soil work of this case on February 6, 2010 (it shall be changed to 2,690,000 on two occasions) from the order office, and it shall be in accordance with the contents within 15 days from the date of payment from the order office of this case. The defendant among the original construction work of this case (it shall be omitted from all the provisions on "stock company"), the earth work of this case (it shall be 1,479,404,00 (it shall be changed to 2,690,000 on two occasions) and each of the above plaintiffs shall be given up the construction work of this case, and each of the above plaintiffs shall be given up the construction work from the order office of this case.

5. From April 1, 200 to April 1, 200, the part of the soil cutting and earth piling up (hereinafter “the earth of this case”) among the above earth works are resumed, and between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.

8. 14. The subcontract document was drawn up as shown below:

On the other hand, the Defendant, among the above earth works, did not subcontract to the Plaintiff, and agreed to directly implement the soil transport work with the Plaintiff’s cooperation. The Plaintiff, for the soil work, had equipment business operators employed for the soil work transport the soil, and sent the equipment specifications to the Defendant, so that the Defendant paid the construction cost to the equipment business operator.

The plaintiff from the defendant in relation to the main contract construction works, the "Seoul Pyeong bridge structure works" or "Seoul Pyeong tunnel structure works" and the other part of the tunnel construction works and soil works in this case, and drainage works on August 14, 2008 and March 20, 2009.