logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2014.12.12 2014고단1356
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

(1) On January 15, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for one month and eight months for fraud in the order of the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the net prison on June 6, 2014.

【2014 Highest 1356】

1. On September 13, 2014, at around 00:01 through 02:00, the Defendant: (a) had been provided with both 1 disease and Japan in total amounting to KRW 280,000 in the market price by the victim D, even though the victim D had no intent or ability to pay the drinking value; and (b) had taken the same attitude in ordering drinking and drinking to the victim and paying the said price.

[Judgment of the court below]

2. On August 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 22:25, 2014, at the H main station operated by the victim G with the F and fourth floor level as if he/she had the intent and ability to pay the alcohol value; and (b) ordered two weeks of disease, three illnesss of beer, and beer, etc.

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the price of alcoholic beverages, etc. due to the lack of money.

The Defendant received a total amount of KRW 274,00 from the above H’s employee I, and acquired alcohol in the amount of KRW 274,00.

【2014 Highest 1465】

3. On August 10, 2014, around 01:30, the Defendant issued an order for alcohol and alcohol, etc., as if he/she had the intent and ability to pay the drinking value at L points operated by the victim K in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, and the first floor.

However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the price of alcoholic beverages, etc. due to the lack of money.

The defendant acquired alcoholic beverages worth 200,000 won in total from the victim K.

【2014 Highest 1495】

4. On August 25, 2014, the Defendant against the victim M showed the same attitude that the victim M did not have the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value, and that the Defendant ordered the victim M to pay the alcohol and alcohol and paid the price in total from the victim M, even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the alcohol value.

arrow