The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the lower court’s punishment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, in light of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of the instant case, including the following: (a) the crime of this case was committed on the ground that the nature of the crime is not good in light of the background of the crime, the relationship between the Defendant and the victim, etc.; (b) the Defendant was unable to agree with the victim; (c) the Defendant appears to have failed to endeavor to recover from damage; and (d) the Defendant had a large number of criminal records; and (c) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for the same crime on October 22, 2015 and the repeated crime was committed again on the ground that the period of the repeated crime was not longer past, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, ex officio, the fact that the phrase "by force of the victim" in Part II of the decision of the court below is "by force" is corrected as "by force."