The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

In light of all the sentencing conditions in the records and pleadings of this case, including the fact that the court below's punishment (three million won) was too unreasonable and the defendant did not appear to have denied and reflect the crime of this case in the investigative agency, and that it appears that the defendant did not have made efforts to recover damage before the court below sentenced the judgment, and that the defendant had a number of criminal records including the records of punishment imposed by the defendant, etc., even though considering that the defendant reached an agreement with the victim during the trial, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable on the grounds as stated in its reasoning.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the deletion of “the CD,” in Chapter 10, ex officio, shall be corrected.