The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below against the defendant on the summary of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of one year, the imprisonment of one year, the long-term of one year, the short-term of ten months, the confiscation and the compensation order) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendants still seem to have an attitude against the age of the Defendants, the fact that the Defendants agreed with the victims of the 2018 Highest 497 case, etc. are favorable to the Defendants, but the lower court appears to have taken into account the circumstances favorable to the Defendants, and the crime of Bosing is deemed to have already been committed in light of the circumstances favorable to the Defendants. The crime of Bosing is an organized and intelligent crime and requires a very serious social harm, and there is no special circumstance or circumstance to be considered newly after the lower judgment was rendered, and in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, including the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, and consequence, and the following circumstances, the Defendants’ punishment is deemed unfair, and thus, the Defendants’ assertion on the punishment of the Defendants is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, on the ground that Defendant B’s “Defendant B” in Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is obvious in the records that it is a clerical error of “Defendant A”, and thus, ex officio correction is made pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure.