The Defendants’ appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentencing against the Defendants on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the Defendants is recognized that the Defendants’ mistakes are divided, and the Defendants do not have any criminal records exceeding the same kind of criminal records or fine.

However, considering the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not considerably good, that the amount received by the defendants is considerably larger, and that the conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, such as the age, sex and environment of the defendants, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., are considered, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendants' assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure). (Inasmuch as it is apparent that each of the “Defendants” in the case of “A” and “B” following each of the “Defendants” in the case of “2016 senior group 5984 senior group 1278” among the facts constituting the crime and the summary of evidence of the lower judgment, it is apparent that the Defendants’ appeal was omitted by mistake, and thus, it is corrected to add it ex officio, pursuant to Article