1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant (appointed parties) and the appointed parties are dismissed, respectively.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

1. Basic facts

가. 이 사건 공동주택의 신축 및 대지권등기 1) 서울 서대문구 M 임야 926m ^{2}, N 임야 50m ^{2}, O 임야 165m ^{2}, P 임야 1,114m ^{2}, Q 임야 632m ^{2}(이하 ‘이 사건 분할 전 토지’라 한다

Defendant, Selected G, Selected I Co., Ltd. (former trade name before the change: L Co., Ltd.; hereinafter “Appointed”)

(C), B, D, E, and F (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendant, etc.”)

1) According to the reasoning of the judgment below, I did not agree with the following facts: (a) collective housing with a total of 47 households, including the section for exclusive use in which the portion of exclusive use is indicated on the ground of the land before the instant partition; and (b) the designated party I owned a collective housing with a total of 47 households in the same household

(2) On September 22, 1986, as the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “Aggregate Buildings Act”) was enacted and enforced by Act No. 3725, after newly building and completing registration of ownership preservation, the ownership registration for the 47 households of the instant apartment house was completed on September 2, 1986 on the ground that the ownership of the instant land, which is the object of the site ownership, was the ownership ownership, and the ownership ownership registration for the instant 47 households of the instant apartment house, was completed.

(다만, 가동 306호의 경우 이 사건 분할 전 토지 중 서울 서대문구 M 임야 926m ^{2}, N 임야 50m ^{2}, O 임야 165m ^{2}, P 임야 1,114m ^{2}에 관하여는 56.2/2887 지분, 다동 지층 1호, 2호의 경우 16.53/2887 지분의 대지권등기가 마쳐졌다). 나.

이 사건 분할 전 토지의 분할 및 환지 1) 이 사건 분할 전 토지 중 서울 서대문구 M 임야 926m ^{2}는 1998. 9. 30. M 임야 142m ^{2} 및 R 임야 784m ^{2}로 분할되어 1998. 10. 7. 분할등기가 경료되었다. 2) 한편 서울 서대문구 S 일대 476필지 155,731.5m ^{2}를 사업시행구역으로 하는 T구역 주택개량재개발사업의 사업시행자인 서울특별시 서대문구청장은 구 도시재개발법(2002. 12. 30. 법률 제6852호로 폐지되기 전의 것)에 따라 2000....