Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 8, 2014, around 23:30 on July 23, 2014, the Defendant insultd the victim openly insulting the victim on the ground that the victim D (25 years old) of the police officer affiliated with the Seoul Western Police Station C District of Seoul Western Police Station, who was dispatched after receiving the 112 report from the taxi driver, was asked for the circumstances of the case by the taxi charge issue before the exit of the mountain basin 306, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and then called “the victim, who was seated in the surrounding sperm, will be able to see the victim.”

2. The Defendant: (a) committed assault, at the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1) of the same Article, to the police officer E, who was sent to the police officer D, with the intent of arresting him as an offender in the crime of insult, and the police officer D, who was tight and next to the police officer D, attempted to restrain him from arresting him as an offender in the crime of insult; (b) again, the Defendant took a bath to the police officer D; (c) “I am this ring, I am am flab, I am flab, I am am flab.”; and (d) assaulted the police officer’s lawful performance of duties relating to crime prevention, suppression and investigation.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows, and the sentencing conditions as shown in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account all the factors indicated in the instant pleadings.

The Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and is in profoundly against the Defendant.

B. The Defendant is a primary offender.

C. The degree of assault that the defendant uses to police officers is relatively relatively less and less.