1. The defendant,

A. The Plaintiff A’s KRW 22,012,50 and the annual rate from August 18, 201 to July 3, 2014; and

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Railroad construction project (Crefinites construction project) - Public notice: D public notice of the Ministry of Construction and Transportation on January 28, 2008, E in August 29, 2008, E in public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on July 16, 2009, G public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on July 24, 2009, HH public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on October 30, 209, and I-project operator announced by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on November 18, 2010: Defendant

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on June 24, 201 (hereinafter “adjudication of expropriation”) - Each land and obstacles described in the “amount of compensation” in the “amount of compensation” in the attached Form “amount of compensation” (hereinafter collectively referred to as “each land and obstacles of this case”) - The amount indicated in the “amount of compensation for losses” in the attached Form “amount of compensation for losses” - The amount indicated in the “amount of compensation for losses” in the “amount of compensation for losses” - The date of commencement of expropriation on the claim for decline in the remaining value of Plaintiff B’s J, K, and L (hereinafter “the remaining land of this case”): The date of expropriation: The appraisal corporation of August 17, 201 - the Korean Land Appraisal Corporation, the Korean Land Appraisal Corporation, the

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection (hereinafter “adjudication”) dated March 15, 2012 - Contents of the adjudication: Increase the amount of compensation for losses in the amount indicated in the “adjudication rendered by the No.D.” column for the “amount of compensation” in the attached Form “The amount of compensation” - An appraisal corporation: one appraisal corporation, one stock company, and one appraisal corporation [founded grounds]] has no dispute, Gap evidence 1-3, and Gap evidence 2-1 through 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. Since compensation for the object of expropriation as stipulated in the objection ruling does not reach just compensation for losses, the defendant is obligated to pay the difference between the amount of compensation determined by the court appraisal and the decision of expropriation and the damages for delay to the plaintiffs.

(The plaintiff's common assertion). (b)

Since the project of this case brought down the value of the remaining land of this case, which constituted the instant expropriated real estate and a group of land, the defendant.