Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for three months.
However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On February 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the part of the emergency department of the hospital in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, on the grounds that, while receiving treatment for the injury, the Defendant reported that the Defendant 112 was frightening and frighting the Defendant’s sound; and (b) the police officer G at the Daejeon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, the police box called that “I would follow the doctor’s medical treatment that I would have been receiving medical treatment without the mind of other hospital, and would have received medical treatment.” However, the Defendant interfered with the police officer’s order and lawful performance of duties concerning the handling of the report, by assaulting the Defendant, such as cutting down and pushed down the fat of the fat of the above G, thereby obstructing the police officer’s duty.
2. When Defendant B was arrested as a current offender for the same criminal facts as stated in paragraph (1) at the same time and place as stated in paragraph (1), Defendant B obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender who interfered with the police officer’s performance of duties by putting clothes and arms on the police officer G and preventing A from getting on the patrol vehicle.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Statement of the police statement related to G;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning CCTV video recording;
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment): Defendant B: Article 136(1) (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant B of the suspended sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act [the punishment to be suspended: fine of three million won, detention in a workhouse: Article 70(1) and Article 69(2)(1) of the Criminal Act) of the Criminal Act [the act of exercising force against a police officer in the course of performing official duties is poor; however, the act of exercising force against a police officer is contrary to the nature of the crime; however, all the Defendants are committed at the time of committing the crime (the Defendant A stated to the effect that the situation at the time of committing the crime, such as receiving brain surgery after the framework of the crime due to an accident immediately before committing the crime, is entirely not memory, but it is interpreted as denying the fact of the crime, and even if so, the Defendant’s assertion is against the above.