logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.06.21 2016나59495
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The court's explanation concerning this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

[In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the first instance court, the fact finding and judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and there is no error as alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal. According to the evidence No. 2-1, even in the case of divorce, etc. between the Plaintiff and C, Incheon District Court Decision 2014Reu534, Nov. 14, 2014, it is recognized that C asserted that the owner of real estate listed in the attached list was the Defendant, but the above assertion was rejected on the ground that there is no evidence to acknowledge it. 2. Accordingly, the first instance court is justified, and thus, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed.

arrow