logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.06.13 2018나115250
건물등철거
Text

1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, and such reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

[Grounds for appeal by the defendant is not significantly different from the argument in the first instance court, and even if the evidence duly adopted and examined by the first instance court shows that the defendant submitted the evidence Nos. 7 through 10 (including the number of branch numbers) to the court of first instance, the fact-finding and the judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable, and there is no error as alleged by the defendant as the grounds for appeal by the defendant. The defendant asserted that the loan contract between the plaintiff and the defendant for use between the defendant was made by the time limit until the livestock industry is operated. However, the evidence submitted by the defendant alone is insufficient to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. As seen earlier, it is recognized that the plaintiff and the defendant established a loan agreement for use without an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit)

arrow