Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant A’s previous convictions after the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act] On October 15, 2015, after having been sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court, on October 23, 2015, the judgment was finalized on October 23, 2015. Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence for habitual assault in the same court on December 22, 2015 and became final and conclusive on December 30, 2015.

[2] Defendant A is a person who actually operated the “F Game Center” in the same year, and Defendant B is a person responsible for the management of the game room in the name of the above game room. G is a person responsible for the management of the game room in the name of the above game room. The head of the management office in charge of the overall business of the game room, such as the management of the books of the above game room, H is an employee in charge of money exchange in the above game room, and I is an employee in charge of money exchange for customers in the above game room, and if customers request money exchange in the above game room, he is an employee

No one shall arrange for exchange or exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of a game funeral.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, in collusion with the above G, H, and I from the end of September 2015 to October 17, 2015, set up 40 game machine for “use” game with the above F, and then, an unspecified number of customers finding the above game hall converted the points obtained through the use of the game product into the amount obtained by deducting 10% of the fee from the fee.

The Defendants conspired with the above G, etc. to engage in the business of exchanging tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of the game site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the prosecution against H, I, G, and Defendants;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to I, H and G;

1. Each police statement made to G and J;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Matters concerning permission to change the business of producing general games;