A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 22:30 on October 20, 2017, the Defendant received contact between the Defendant’s residence located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant’s her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son,

Who has reported or Who has reported

Recognizing that " she was found to have " she was found to have reported" H

As ‘I am her hand, I am her son with the above H’s her hand at one time, and F her son voiceed the Defendant, “I am her son, I am son, I am am her face, I am her face, I am her face off to the floor, I am her face, and am her face her face again.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the control of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to F or G by the police;

1. Notification of a department related to the report of the 112 case, and application of statutes on photographs of victimized police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. A sentence shall be imposed in consideration of the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is misleading, that a certain amount of money is deposited against a victimized police officer, that there is no record of criminal punishment after 2009, that a defendant is receiving mental treatment by depression, etc.