A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 14, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assaults, etc. against drivers) (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) took place on the street front of the modern department store located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by getting off the Victim B CK5 taxi, and going through a funeral IC, which is located in 130-ro, Y-gu, U.S., Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, U.S., Seoyang-gu, and without any justifiable reason, she expressed the victim’s desire to read “Nins, frings, and frings, in accordance with the principle)”

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was dispatched to the site by the Defendant, at the vicinity of the shooting distance in the above paragraph (1) above, the taxi of the above B was set up on the side and reported 112 on the side, and was dispatched to the site by the Defendant F, a slope belonging to the D police station of the Busan Metropolitan City, and a policeman.

Therefore, without any justifiable reason, the defendant must be asked to return home from the above slope E to the slope E, etc. upon being asked by the above slope E for the reasons of the case.

“To perform the bath theory,” and to spathize the chest of slope E, and to spathize it.

Then, as the Defendant was said to be genuine from F, and satisfed, he expressed his bath to see, “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I am satf’s satch with his hand and pushed off, and pushed off.

On the same day, the Defendant was arrested in flagrant offender and went to the Hansan Police Station located in the same Dongsan-dong as the same day, and the Defendant tried to go out of the police station G G, which did not follow the direction of the police officer, and the situation he was removed from the G, and the Defendant got her arms of the above Inspector H by hand. On the same day, around 05:30 on the same day, the Defendant continued to go back from the above G office, and she was forced to go to go out of the said G office, and she was forced to go out from the slope I to go out of the said G office.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and the maintenance of order by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B, E, F, I, .