Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for two years, respectively.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 05:30 on June 23, 2012, Defendants A, at the main point of “F” located in Gunsan-si, Sinsan-si, for the following reasons that the horses of the victim G (n, 27 years of age) were unbured, the victim’s chest was placed in the victim’s chest. In other words, the victim’s head head was fluoral disease, which is a dangerous article on the table table, and the victim’s head was fluored once, and the head was fluored once. Defendant B, in combination with this, was fluoring the head of the victim’s G, and when the victim’s head was fluoral, the victim’s head was unknown during about 2 weeks of treatment.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to inflict bodily injury on the victim by carrying dangerous objects.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), the victim H (n, 33 years old) who told A to satisfy G, got the victim go beyond the floor and let the victim go knife on the shoulder glass angle, thereby having the victim suffer approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Photographs of each victim's upper part of the body;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act as to the facts of crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Articles 262 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of inflicting an injury on carrying a dangerous object), Articles 262 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B from among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The Defendants under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, who led to the confession of the instant crime, committed a mistake, did not focus on the damage to the victim G, and the Defendants agreed with the victim H.