1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 29, 199, the Plaintiff entered the Army and served on the Army, and was discharged from military service on November 2, 2000.

B. On January 6, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground that “In the training center around May 1999, the Plaintiff: (a) caused the injury of knee-man in the right-hand skne, knee-skne, and was engaged in transporting heavy goods as a warehouse disease without timely treatment; and (b) aggravated the state of kne-man’s kne-skne’s status while transporting heavy goods as a warehouse.” (hereinafter “instant No. 1”) different applications for registration of persons eligible for veteran’s compensation.

C. On August 26, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition that “The aggregate of the aggregate of the aggregate of the aggregate of the aggregate of the aggregate of the aggregate of the first and fourth resin in the right, does not meet the requirements of Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State”), and falls under the requirements of Article 4(1)6 of the Act on Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran’s Compensation (hereinafter “the Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State”), and the right-hand knee per kne (hereinafter “instant No. 2”) does not meet the requirements of persons of distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation”

Therefore, the plaintiff raised an objection against the defendant, but was dismissed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, 2 and 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. On May 199, the Plaintiff asserted that he was injured to knenee in an accident falling out of shock training (hereinafter “instant accident”) at the training center. The Plaintiff was at the time of visiting the stage, but he was at the time of visiting the stage, and was carrying out the duties of knee, kneeing goods while working in a warehouse with no proper treatment, and around June 199.