logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.09.08 2017고단802
모해위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who had been employed as a pilot for aviation against a stock company on November 1, 1987 and served as a passenger plane captain until January 2017.

On October 22, 2015, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath at the Seoul Central District Court 2013 High Court 44666, the 18th trial in Seocho-gu, Seoul, Seoul, on October 22, 2015, as a witness of the Defendant’s case, including defamation against the victim C, and the Defendant did not meet the qualification conditions to apply for the instrument flight test conducted by the Korea Transportation Safety Authority around November 1, 1988, because the Defendant did not complete the instrument flight training at the time of the Army Service at the Army (from August 1, 1975 to May 1, 1985). However, the Defendant’s defense counsel responded to the question “for example, the witness had loaded the instrument at the time of the Army at the time of the Army at the time of the Army,” and “I have some qualifications and conditions.”

The answer is that “A witness has graduated from the instrument flight process in the Army”, and “A witness has graduated from the instrument flight process in the Army.”

The answer to the question of “Atop” and the question of “Abandt when the instrument flight was made or when the instrument flight was made, whether the instrument flight flight operator does not memory the instrument flight operator,” made an instrument flight at the time of the aviation school service.

“The answer was made.”

As a result, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory for the purpose of undermining the victim's criminal case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Protocol of examination of the witness (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2013 Height 4466);

1. Statement made by the police with regard to C;

1. - Data to be submitted (written records of examination of witnesses referred to as "D");

1. - One copy of the examination protocol A by a witness of the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2013 Godan 4466 ( October 22, 2015)

1. Investigative Report (Ad Hoc of Indictment and Attachment of Case Proceedings), - Copy of the indictment, and the details of trial proceeding [the defendant did not aim to harm the defendant.]

In the case of perjury, Article 152 (2) of the Criminal Code.

arrow