All appeals by the Defendants and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Each sentence (Defendant A: Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and June, Defendant B: imprisonment for a year and two months, Defendant F: imprisonment for a year and ten months) declared by the court below to the Defendants is too unreasonable.

B. The above punishment, which the court below decided against the Defendants, is too unhued and unfair.

2. We also examine the Defendants and the Prosecutor’s arguments.

The Defendants appear to be against the Defendants’ recognition of all the instant crimes, and the Defendants’ role in withdrawing and remitting the instant crime in the instant “Singinging,” and do not lead the said crimes as a whole; the Defendants did not have any history of criminal punishment for the same type of crime; there was no history of criminal punishment other than fines; and there was no history of criminal punishment other than punishment for other crimes; and the Defendants’ family members and branch members want to take the Defendant’s preference, etc. favorable to the Defendants.

On the other hand, the crime of " Bosing", the same as the crime of this case, is highly harmful to society, the crime is committed systematically, systematically, and artificially, and because it is difficult to arrest the entire organization, it is in need of strict punishment even if a subordinate organization participating in only part of the crime, and the Defendants committed the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in the course of participating in the " Bosing" crime. In addition, the Defendants committed the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in the course of participating in the " Bosing" crime. In addition, the Defendants committed the crime of acting as a broker for commercial sex acts; the number of crimes directly taken part in cash withdrawals by the Defendants and the amount of damage therefrom; the amount of the criminal proceeds distributed to the Defendants is considerable; the Defendants continued to participate in the crime of " Bosinging" even though they knew of the arrest of Ma who is an accomplice; and the Defendants did not recover damage even if the victims occurred due to the Defendants.

All these circumstances and the circumstances leading the Defendants to participate in the crime.