Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On September 15, 2018, from around 12:05 to 12:35 of the same day, the Defendant filed a civil petition with the police officer of the above police box, stating that he/she did not pay KRW 50,00,00,00 after having found in the influence of alcohol three mobile phones to the police officer assigned to the above police box, while he/she was found in the influence of alcohol, on the ground that he/she did not have a satisfactory solution, “a few spaws to this spaths” were taken to the police officer of the above police box on the ground that he/she did not have a satisfactory solution.

Before being able to take the bath as “welves”, it was difficult to avoid disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as taking an article into consideration.

Accordingly, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to a very rough speech and behavior in the police box that is a government office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (on-site mobilization, accompanying video CDs);

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (Optional to the punishment);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is as follows: (a) the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was unable to have avoided disturbance for about 30 minutes by taking the police officers without permission at a police station district located within the police station, and thus, the crime is not good in light of the details thereof and the method thereof.

In addition, the defendant has been punished 6 times due to the violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, insult, and obstruction of the performance of official duties by fraudulent means against police officers, and has committed recidivism without being aware of the last period of probation.

In the past five years, the Defendant repeatedly commits the same kind of crime for a short period of time, to the extent that five of the same criminal records are concentrated.

However, the defendant reflects his fault in depth.

It is a crime committed by a police officer by losing and interesting self-control power with a police officer in order to raise compensation issue for lost and portable telephone call that the defendant acquired and acquired in the police station.