A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence 1 (one chain) shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On June 9, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at Seoul Southern District Court on June 9, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 17, 2014, and is currently under the suspension period.

[2015 Highest 398] On February 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) up to 02:15, 2015, the Defendant: (b) opened a back door of the said door and intruded into the door into the door by using the key in which he was in possession of the victim D; and (c) took 67,300 won in cash, which is the owner of the victim, who was enrolled in the saving bank in the calculation unit.

[2015 Height614] On September 9, 2014, around 18:45 to 19:00 on September 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) entered the office through the window of the unlocked church office in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and stolen the victim H cash owned by 1.80,000 won.

[2015 Highest 748]

1. Crimes against the victim I;

A. On July 11, 2014, at around 15:20 on July 11, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement that “The Defendant would pay the leased fee to the victim even though he did not have the intent or ability to pay the rental fee even if he/she lent the off-to-land at the “K Bak shop operated by the victim in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.”

The Defendant, on July 14, 2014, 11.160,000 won of the rental fee of the Orala is not paid by the Defendant from the victim to August 14, 2014, after the Defendant was replaced by Magner Oba in front of Mag-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-ro, 68 Sinsan-ro, Sinsan-ro, Magnera, Mag-ro, Mag-ro, Magba, in the same day as LON, from the victim

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

B. Around August 14, 2014, the Defendant, as set forth in paragraph 1(a), did not return the lebane, even though the rental period expired while the Defendant kept Magners, the market price of which is equivalent to two million won owned by the victim for the victim I for the victim I.

This is the defendant's property of the victim.