logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2012.08.22 2012고정109
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 24, 201, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Dok-in Vehicle) is driving Ck5 vehicle on the road in front of Pyeongtaek-dong 579 Radon at the Namyang-si, Namyang-si on November 24, 201 and proceeding to turn to the left at the right at a ero-distance speed from the lender apartment bank. Since the place is a three-distance intersection where a signal is installed, the driver of all vehicles operating the road has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the signal and direction displayed by the traffic safety facilities and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the part on the right side of the accident vehicle of the Defendant’s driving, which is located in the top direction from the bend of the math in the bend of the math of the math by negligence, and is located in the top direction from the bend of the math of the math of the left.

In the end, the Defendant suffered injuries, such as fluoral salt bars, which require stability for about two weeks, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victims at the site of the accident.

2. A violation of the Road Traffic Act (not to take measures after an accident) provided that the Defendant destroyed the damaged vehicle of the victim to receive repair costs of KRW 2,219,195 due to the same accident as paragraph (1) and escaped without taking measures at the scene of the accident.

3. On the same date as paragraph (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the Defendant driven the vehicle involved in the instant accident at a drinking level of about 10 km from the boom site where it is located in Pyeongtaek-si to the road in front of the Guriri-si, the blood alcohol concentration of about 0.106%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. A report on the actual status of traffic accidents, and a report on the actual status of drivers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of the injury diagnosis by this court;

1. Relevant Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes: Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and the Criminal Act;

arrow