logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2020.01.09 2019가단1820
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the buildings listed in the separate sheet, each point of the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 shall be in sequence.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

3. The Plaintiff asserts that, on April 23, 2018, a lease contract between the Defendant and the Defendant for the lease deposit of KRW 3,000,000 for the instant building and KRW 400,000 for the monthly rent was concluded, but the said lease deposit was reduced to KRW 1,50,000, and that the monthly rent is KRW 50,000.

However, it is not sufficient to recognize the plaintiff's above assertion only with the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion on the claim for the refund of unpaid rent or unjust enrichment exceeding the amount calculated at the rate of KRW 400,000 per month among the claims in this case is without merit.

arrow