logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.11.17 2016가합101700
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 102,066,138 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from November 17, 2015 to November 17, 2016.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff of the relationship between the parties and the original production contract is a company that runs the original group, the manufacturing of miscellaneous products and the wholesale and retail business, and the defendant is a company that manufactures the clothing products and engages in wholesale and retail business.

In order to produce “Pool trading” ordered by MproS Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “MproS”), the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff to manufacture the original group (100% PAL TFEA 230T, hereinafter “instant original group”) over three occasions as indicated in the following table, and the Plaintiff produced and manufactured the said original group at a Chinese factory, and supplied it to the Defendant’s Cambodia’s salary-making factory.

On April 22, 2015, the Defendant sent the 1st 2015 name (U.S./US 800), BV 20, 30G 20, 230, 700, 700, 700, 700, 700, 206, 205, 2015, 200, 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,00

On June 2, 2015, the Plaintiff received a test report from the Korea Category Test Research Institute to the effect that the original order meets the criteria for the power supply water required by the Defendant, etc., and sent a final request (hereinafter “instant request”) to the Defendant on June 5, 2015 regarding the existence of defects in the original order, such as width, promotion, color, generation of water, and static electricity.

The above request will be promptly loaded upon the order of loading according to the result of confirmation by the defendant.

The Plaintiff.

arrow