logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.08.28 2013고단587
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. On January 208, 2008, the Defendant stated that the victim D’s house located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, U.S., would have repaid the victim with money necessary to purchase his name.

However, in fact, the Defendant operated a gas station selling pseudo petroleum, but did not have a bad credit standing at the time, and did not lend money from the victim, and did not have an intent or ability to repay money.

Accordingly, on January 16, 2008, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; and (b) received KRW 29 million from the victim as a loan for oil fraud in front of the community credit cooperatives in Geumcheon-dong, a considerable amount of money for oil fraud; and (c) from November 6, 2009 to November 6, 2009, by deceiving the victim by the above method; and (d) received from the victim a total of KRW 68,200,000,000 as a loan for oil fraud, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

B. On April 2009, the Defendant told the victim of the above victim’s house that “I want to operate his business by leasing the gas station to the river station,” and that I want to repay the money immediately to the money borrowed prior to the loan of KRW 15.6 million due to the shortage of deposit.”

However, in fact, the Defendant operated a gas station selling pseudo petroleum, but did not have a bad credit standing at the time, and did not lend money from the victim, and did not have an intent or ability to repay money.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was delivered KRW 15.6 million from the victim on April 21, 2009 as the borrowed money for the security deposit for the business of a gas station in front of the community credit cooperatives in Geumcheon-dong, a substantial amount of Geumcheon-gu, Geumcheon-gu.

2. The following circumstances recognized by the records of the instant case, namely, introduction of the victim to E around 2006 to 2007.

arrow