Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 132,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from December 11, 201 to June 11, 2014 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
Around November 2010, the defendant used the trade name B, and ordered the construction of a new E Complex Building in Yangju-si, a joint forest construction company (hereinafter referred to as the "joint forest construction") at Yangju-si. The plaintiff started the construction of a new construction of a new E Complex Building in Yangju-si. The plaintiff started the construction of a new construction of a new land among the above construction of a permanent forest integrated construction (hereinafter referred to as "the instant construction").
On April 13, 2011, the Defendant terminated the said contract with the Forestry General Construction Division (including value-added tax) (the Defendant agreed with the Plaintiff, on April 13, 201, to pay KRW 645,590,000 (including value-added tax) for the construction cost of the instant case to the Plaintiff in five equal installments). On May 2, 2011, the head of a stock company awarded a contract for the construction (hereinafter “construction”). On May 2, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into a subcontract with the construction with the construction with the construction as KRW 645,590,00 (including value-added tax) and completed the instant construction on September 2, 2011.
According to the design of the instant construction, the Plaintiff’s filling of cement grass, etc. is intended to improve the ground of the instant construction up to 10 meters underground or prevent water leakage, etc., influents, etc. of earth and sand or rocks.
As water leakage occurred on the part of the ship while the tamper and the tamper were in progress, the head of the Defendant’s on-site agent F instructed employees G to resolve water leakage, and the Plaintiff, according to G’s instruction, carried out reinforcement works (hereinafter “additional works”) to resolve water leakages by up to 13.5 meters underground, and completed around July 201.
On September 201, the Plaintiff requested the construction to modify the design relating to the additional construction. On September 21, 201, the construction has the Defendant’s right to modify the design, and the head shall notify the Plaintiff of the confirmation of the content of the design and the submission of the documents related to the construction.