logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2015.02.16 2014고합192
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2012, the Defendant is a person elected to and held for the head of a Gun in a special election for the head of a Gun on April 11, 2012 and nationwide local election for the head of a Gun on June 4, 2014, respectively.

A local government shall not make a contribution to a person in the constituency concerned, or an institution, organization, or facility, or a person who is residing outside the constituency concerned, or an institution, organization, or facility having relations with the electorate.

1. On August 2013, 2013, the Defendant made a contribution to the police officer, at the military room of the DGun Office located in Jeonnam, on August 2013, 2013, the Defendant issued one bag containing KRW 200,000 in cash and one bag containing the agricultural products worth KRW 100,000,000.

2. On October 22, 2013, around October 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) completed an interview with the K reporter G having jurisdiction over D Gun at the above D Gun Situation Office; and (b) issued one bag containing KRW 200,000 in cash to G via the staff of the D Gun Office.

Accordingly, the defendant made a contribution act to the electorate or a person related to him.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of the witness F [the second fact at the time of sale];

1. The part of the witness G’s legal statement (excluding the part of the statement to the effect that “the military personnel of the military administration stated that he was dnicking because he was dnicking because he was dnicking,” which the witness G used the part concerning the Defendant’s professional statement from the military personnel of the military administration as direct evidence for this part of the facts charged (contribution act by the Defendant) and constitutes a so-called re-specialized statement. However, the part concerning the Defendant’s professional statement cannot be used as evidence because the Defendant did not agree to use it as evidence.

1. Each legal statement of I and J;

1. Report materials for news reports: K news reports;

arrow