logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.15 2016가단5183872
점포인도 등 청구
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, the Attached Form 1 marks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1 of the Attached Form 1.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 2, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant to lease the part of Paragraph (1) (a) of the Disposition (hereinafter “instant store”) (hereinafter “instant store”) to the Defendant by setting the lease deposit of KRW 102,051,250 (Additional Tax separate), monthly rent of KRW 20,859,275 (Additional Tax Separate), management expenses monthly, KRW 3,779,865 (Additional Tax Separate Tax separate), and the lease term from June 1, 2014 to November 30, 2020.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). The lease deposit, rent, and management expenses were adjusted according to the following periods, and the agreed damages rate for delay was 19% per annum.

B. Upon entering into the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Defendant that the Defendant should use the part (b) and (c) (hereinafter “instant warehouse”) of Paragraph (1) of this case along with the instant store, and pay the usage fee as follows.

In addition, the above contract on the warehouse of this case agreed to terminate at the same time when the lease contract of this case is terminated.

C. The Defendant, who received the instant store and warehouse from the Plaintiff, has been operating the “Shh School Pung-dong store”, and has occupied and used it until now.

Although the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to be exempted from the rent corresponding to the amount of two months (However, the Defendant’s failure to pay the exempted amount to the Plaintiff when the instant lease contract is terminated due to a cause attributable to the Defendant), and delayed payment from February 28, 2016 to June 28, 2016.

E. Accordingly, on June 28, 2016, the Plaintiff declared that the instant lease agreement was terminated as of June 30, 2016, on the ground that the Defendant was in arrears with three or more vehicles by means of the content certification, and the said content certification was served on the Defendant on the 29th of the same month.

F. Meanwhile, the Defendant did not pay to the Plaintiff by June 30, 2016.

arrow