1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, Plaintiff N,O, P, Q, S, T, U, V, X, Y, Z, AA, which is equivalent to the following amount ordered to be paid:

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases.

Part 19, Part 17 and Part 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance "the date of the closing of argument in this case" shall be written as " December 19, 2017, which is the date of the closing of argument in the court of first instance."

The first instance court's sentence Nos. 21 to 12 are as follows. "The former Criminal Compensation Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Criminal Compensation Act") shall be amended."

Article 6(1) of the Criminal Compensation and Restoration of Honor Act provides that "this Act shall not prohibit a person entitled to compensation from claiming compensation pursuant to other Acts," and Article 6(3) of the same Act provides that "where a person entitled to compensation has received compensation for the same cause under this Act, the amount of compensation shall be determined after deducting the amount of compensation therefor shall be determined."

[Attachment D.] The specific amount of compensation to be paid by the plaintiffs shall be adjusted according to the family relationship and specific inheritance ratio as seen earlier, and if criminal compensation is deducted, the specific amount of compensation to be paid by the plaintiffs shall be added to each of the relevant money stated in the [Attachment 2] claim and the "total amount of compensation" in the attached Form 1 (the "amount of compensation" in the attached Form 1).

same as this section.

Therefore, with respect to each of the relevant money stated in the “total amount of award” in the “amount of claim and the amount of award” in attached Table 2 against Plaintiff N,O, P, Q, Q, Q, U,V, W, Y, Z, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AF, and AG, and with respect to each of the corresponding money stated in the “amount of award” in the “amount of the judgment of the first instance” in the same Table, the Civil Act stipulates that it is reasonable for the Defendant to dispute as to the existence or scope of the obligation from December 19, 2017, which is the date of the closing of the first instance trial to January 30, 2018.