logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.05.02 2017구단60232
추가상이 비해당처분 취소청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 27, 1967, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on September 13, 1969, and was recognized as meeting the requirements for persons who rendered distinguished services to the State by the Defendant with respect to the "Saeaeng" suffered in the Vietnam War in the course of performing military operations. On November 26, 2001, the Plaintiff was determined as Grade 7, Grade 801 as a result of the physical examination conducted on November 26, 2001, and registered as a person of distinguished services to the State (person of distinguished services to the State).

B. On January 20, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for additional recognition of his/her major injury by using the “YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTSYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTSYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, Eul evidence 1-6, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The plaintiff asserts that the disposition of this case in question is unlawful, since the ability of the plaintiff aggravated due to the explosion of Vietnam War as of the time of participation in the Vietnam War, the disposition of this case which did not recognize the wounds of this case as an additional prize.

According to the evidence evidence evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the plaintiff is found to have been diagnosed as "hynasium with the unknown tynasium" at a medical institution on January 17, 2017 and May 8, 2017, but there is no evidence to prove that the difference in this case was caused by the explosion of the Vietnam War at the time of Vietnam War.

Therefore, the instant disposition is lawful.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow