beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On March 21, 1952, the Plaintiff entered the Army and discharged the Plaintiff from military service on October 31, 1953.
B. On April 1953, the Plaintiff sustained an injury in battles nearby the Yamama of the YA and filed an application for registration with the Defendant to the Defendant on August 17, 2001 at the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement to the Defendant on August 17, 2001, and the Plaintiff was in military service.
6. On May 23, 2003, the Defendant recognized that “the trade in the 3,4 resin cutting, the 3,4, and the 6th century was a soldier or policeman wounded in action,” and on May 23, 2003, the Defendant determined the Plaintiff’s disability rating as to “the 3,4 balance cutting, the cutting of the 3,4, the 3, and the 3,4, and the 3, and the 3, and the 3, and the 4, and the 4, and the 6,0
C. However, on July 10, 1986, the registration of the soldier or policeman wounded in action was removed on June 25, 2003 on the ground that the Plaintiff acquired U.S. citizenship and lost the nationality of the Republic of Korea, and upon obtaining permission from the Minister of Justice on October 24, 2012, the Defendant rendered a decision on November 25, 2013 that “the head, inside, and outside, the inner part, the inner part, the main part, the inner part, the inner part, the inner part, the supplementary part, and the adjacent metal part” constituted the requirements for compensation and injury, and notified the Plaintiff thereof.
On April 7, 2014, the Plaintiff submitted additional medical records, EXE and diagnostic records, etc. to the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, and the Defendant requested review ex officio with respect to “satisf and head (closed official certificate),” and on May 7, 2014, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement decided that “satfe and head (closed official certificate)” does not include any objective data to be recognized as wounded in the course of performing its duties in addition to the Plaintiff’s statement, and that on May 9, 2014, the Defendant did not meet the requirements for the Plaintiff’s “satfe and head (dub, inner part, both satfe and left part)” (dub, inner part, both satfe and left part), electric satfe and left part, satfe and left part.