Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant C, D, and E: (a) KRW 128,00,000 for each of them; and (b) Defendant F shall be either Defendant C, D, and E, for each of them; and (c) KRW 120,000 for each of them.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendants’ status (1) Defendant B is a real estate agent of the H Real Estate Brokerage Office located in Busan-gu G (hereinafter “H Real Estate”) as the representative.
(2) Defendant C and D were brokers of H real estate, and Defendant E was an employee of another real estate brokerage company.
Defendant C, D, and E were aware of each other in the course of their duties.
(3) The Defendant Korean Licensed Real Estate Agent Association (hereinafter “Defendant Association”) is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement between Defendant B and Defendant B, which compensates the parties to the transaction for damages incurred to the property by intention or negligence, within the limit of KRW 100,000,000, when Defendant B caused damage to the property of the parties to the transaction.
B. (1) On January 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) requested a parking lot brokerage to H real estate that Defendant C and D, a broker assistant, with a plan to operate a parking lot; and (b) Defendant E, upon Nonparty I’s request from Nonparty I to find out the parking lot located on the 3rd or the 7th underground floor of the aggregate building located in Busan Shipping Daegu Jgu, Busan (hereinafter “instant parking lot”); and (c) asked Defendant C to find out the parking lot located on the 3rd or the 7th underground floor; and (d) was introduced the instant parking lot.
(2) On June 4, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into the instant parking lot with H real estate in order to enter into a contract. At this point, Defendant F, and Defendant E, who were directors of Defendant B, Defendant C, D, and the instant parking lot (hereinafter “K”).
(3) However, in fact, Defendant F, while serving as K director, was already retired from K on May 8, 2015, and the instant parking lot was also leased and operated by a third party (as the instant parking lot remains for a considerable period of time), there is no right to lease the instant parking lot operation right, and there is also a situation in which the instant parking lot can be leased.